from SELF-PORTRAIT IN A CONVEX MIRROR
by John Ashbery
As Parmagianino did it, the right hand
Bigger than the head, thrust at the viewer
And swerving easily away, as though to protect
What it advertises. A few leaded panes, old beams,
Fur, pleated muslin, a coral ring run together
In a movement supporting the face, which swims
Toward and away like the hand
Except that it is in repose. It is what is
Sequestered. Vasari says, “Francesco one day set himself
To take his own portrait, looking at himself for that purpose
In a convex mirror, such as is used by barbers . . .
He accordingly caused a ball of wood to be made
By a turner, and having divided it in half and
Brought it to the size of the mirror, he set himself
With great art to copy all that he saw in the glass,”
Chiefly his reflection, of which the portrait
Is the reflection once removed.
The glass chose to reflect only what he saw
Which was enough for his purpose: his image
Glazed, embalmed, projected at a 180-degree angle.
The time of day or the density of the light
Adhering to the face keep it
Lively and intact in a recurring wave
Of arrival. The soul establishes itself.
But how far can it swim out through the eyes
And still return safely to its nest? The surface
Of the mirror being convex, the distance increases
Significantly; that is, enough to make the point
That the soul is a captive, treated humanely, kept
In suspension, unable to advance much farther
Than your look as it intercepts the picture.
Pope Clement and his court were “stupefied”
By it, according to Vasari, and promised a commission
That never materialized. The soul has to stay where it is,
Even though restless, hearing raindrops on the pane,
The sighing of autumn leaves thrashed by the wind,
Longing to be free, outside, but it must stay
Posing in this place. It must move
As little as possible. This is what the portrait says.
But there is in that gaze a combination
Of tenderness, amusement and regret, so powerful
In its restraint that one cannot look for long.
The secret is too plain. The pity of it smarts,
Makes hot tears spurt: that the soul is not a soul,
Has no secret, is small, and it fits
Its hollow perfectly: its room, our moment of attention.
That is the tune but there are no words.
The words are only speculation
(From the Latin speculum, mirror):
They seek and cannot find the meaning of the music.
We see only postures of the dream,
Riders of the motion that swings the face
Into view under evening skies, with no
False disarray as proof of authenticity.
But it is life englobed.
One would like to stick one’s hand
Out of the globe, but its dimension,
What carries it, will not allow it.
No doubt it is this, not the reflex
To hide something, which makes the hand loom large
As it retreats slightly. There is no way
To build it flat like a section of a wall:
It must join the segment of a circle,
Roving back to the body of which it seems
So unlikely a part, to fence in and shore up the face
On which the effort of this condition reads
Like a pinpoint of a smile, a spark
Or star one is not sure of having seen
As darkness resumes. A perverse light whose
Imperative of subtlety dooms in advance its
Conceit to light up: unimportant but meant.
Francesco, your hand is big enough
To wreck the sphere, and too big,
One would think, to weave delicate meshes
That only argue its further detention.
(Big, but not coarse, merely on another scale,
Like a dozing whale upon the sea bottom
In relation to the tiny, self-important ship
On the surface.) But your eyes proclaim
That everything is surface. The surface is what’s there
And nothing can exist except what’s there.
There are no recesses in the room, only alcoves,
And the window doesn’t matter much, or that
Sliver of window or mirror on the right, even
As a gauge of the weather, which in French is
Le temps, the word for time, and which
Follows a course wherein changes are merely
Features of the whole. The whole is stable within
Instability, a globe like ours, resting
On a pedestal of vacuum, a ping-pong ball
Secure on its jet of water.
And just as there are no words for the surface, that is,
No words to say what it really is, that it is not
Superficial but a visible core, then there is
No way out of the problem of pathos vs. experience.
You will stay on, restive, serene in
Your gesture which is neither embrace nor warning
But which holds something of both in pure
Affirmation that doesn’t affirm anything.
above: Self-portrait in a Convex Mirror, c. 1524 by Parmigianino

July 20, 2007 at 7:34 am
wow.
July 20, 2007 at 7:53 am
Ashbury demonstrates once again
that language trumps image,
Mary’s articulation notwithsatanding.
July 20, 2007 at 8:02 am
Alec: I have been waiting for you to bring up the self-portrait. I was at Jen Beckman last week and I noticed one that fit in oddly. It also did make me put a lot of pieces together; you were on your game earlier thai I. I had read about it but never asked.
How about a week of self-portraiture (photographers that do and photographers that don’t) in the inevitable blogispher…
July 20, 2007 at 4:53 pm
So good, I can hardly stand it.
Love Ashbery ever so much. Great choice, AS.
July 21, 2007 at 10:14 am
I used to be such a huge Ashbery fan and haven’t read him in years. Thanks
July 21, 2007 at 3:46 pm
Sorry to be so mundane in the face of great poetry but wouldn’t that be Parmigianino’s left hand?
July 22, 2007 at 5:14 am
“Sorry to be so mundane in the face of great poetry but wouldn’t that be Parmigianino’s left hand?”
That’s been bothering me, too, Stuart… I’d never read the poem together with the painting before! So much play is made by Ashbery of the hand and the properties of mirrors (and “One would like to stick one’s hand/Out of the globe, but its dimension,/What carries it, will not allow it” is *so* relevant to the previous blog on “straight vs. manipulated” photography) that you have to suspect it’s deliberate. If not, it’s an error of a similar order to Tennyson thinking trains ran in grooves, not on rails…
July 22, 2007 at 8:26 am
From Parmigianino’s perspective, it is his right hand (we are looking at the reflection of a mirror).
July 22, 2007 at 9:00 am
Ondine, sit in front of a concave mirror with your right hand closest to the mirror and tell me if the image you see matches the painting above.
July 23, 2007 at 9:08 pm
When one looks into a mirror is your good side the right side? For me the good side is the right side that is right.
July 29, 2007 at 5:55 pm
M.C. Escher (and Uncle David) have confirmed that smarty-pantsberry was wrong: